Clinical Features and Genetic Analysis of Autosomal Dominant and Recessive Hyperimmunoglobulin E Syndrome
-
摘要:
目的 总结常染色体显性及隐性遗传高免疫球蛋白E综合征(HIES)患儿的临床特征及基因分析。 方法 收集于2013年1月至2021年12月在首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院皮肤科收治的经临床及基因共同确诊为HIES患儿,归纳一般资料并分析其临床特征和基因型特点,比较常染色体显性遗传HIES(AD-HIES)和常染色体隐性遗传HIES(AR-HIES)临床特点的异同。 结果 共收集确诊HIES患儿7例,其中AD-HIES 3例,AR-HIES 4例。男4例,女3例。所有患儿均存在反复发作的顽固性湿疹样皮疹、反复皮肤及肺部感染,以及血清IgE和嗜酸性粒细胞水平升高。AD-HIES与AR-HIES的不同点主要包括:3例AD-HIES患儿皮肤感染均以细菌感染为主要表现(如脓肿、脓疱疮),而4例AR-HIES患儿皮肤均以严重的病毒感染为主要表现(如寻常疣、传染性软疣);3例AD-HIES患儿均存在不同种类的肺部实质改变(如肺大疱、肺囊肿、肺不张),而4例AR-HIES患儿肺部均无类似改变;AR-HIES患儿中3/4存在过敏性疾病(包括哮喘、食物过敏等),而AD-HIES患儿均无过敏性疾病报道;免疫系统外表现方面,AD-HIES更易见鼻梁扁平、高腭弓等特殊面容,AR-HIES中有肿瘤发生情况而AD-HIES尚未见。AD-HIES主要由STAT3基因突变引起,AR-HIES主要由DOCK8基因突变引起,其中两例患儿分别存在DOCK8基因的c.1798-2A>T和c.874G>A为新发突变位点。 结论 对于临床表现为顽固性湿疹样皮疹、反复感染,伴血清IgE水平显著升高的患儿,需寻找早期HIES疑诊线索,尽早进行基因检测明确诊断及分类,以更好地长期管理,改善生存预后。 -
关键词:
- 高免疫球蛋白E综合征 /
- STAT3基因 /
- DOCK8基因 /
- 湿疹 /
- 原发性免疫缺陷病
Abstract:Objective To summarize the clinical and genetic features of children with autosomal dominant and recessive hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome (HIES). Methods HIES patients were studied at the dermatology department of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University were collected, from January 2013 to December 2021, diagnosed by both clinical manifestation and genetic assessment. The general data were summarized, the clinical and genetic characteristics were analyzed, and the similarities and differences between autosomal dominant HIES (AD-HIES) and autosomal recessive HIES (AR-HIES) were compared. Results A total of 7 children with HIES were studied, including 3 cases of AD-HIES and 4 cases of AR-HIES. There were 4 males and 3 females. All children had recurrent eczema-like lesions, recurrent skin and pulmonary infections, and elevated serum IgE and eosinophil levels. The differences between AD-HIES and AR-HIES mainly include: the main cutaneous infection in 3 children with AD-HIES were bacterial infections (such as abscess and impetigo), while in 4 children with AR-HIES, cutaneous infections were mostly severe viral infection (such as verruca vulgaris and molluscum contagiosum). There were pulmonary parenchymal changes (such as pneumatoceles, cyst and atelectasis) in 3 children with AD-HIES, whilst there were no similar changes in the lungs of 4 children with AR-HIES; 75% of children with AR-HIES had allergic diseases (including asthma and food allergy), while there were no reports of allergic diseases in children with AD-HIES. As for manifestations outside of immune system, AD-HIES was more likely to appear facial dysmorphism(such a broad nasal bridge and a high-arched palate). Furthermore, the incidence of tumor in AR-HIES was higher than that in AD-HIES. AD-HIES was mainly caused by the mutation of STAT3 gene, and AR-HIES was mainly caused by the mutation of DOCK8 gene. We reported two new mutation sites of DOCK8 gene c.1798-2A > T and c.874G > A in two cases, respectively. Conclusions For children with clinical manifestations of recurrent eczema-like lesions, repeated infection and significant increase in serum IgE levels, HIES should be suspected, and genetic screening should be carried out to make definite diagnosis and classification, to achieve better long-term management and improve prognosis. -
Key words:
- hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome /
- STAT3 gene /
- DOCK8 gene /
- eczema /
- primary immunodeficiency diseases
-
表 1 3例AD-HIES患儿临床及基因特点
Table 1. Clinical and genetic features of 3 children with AD-HIES
项目 AD-HIES P1 P2 P3 一般信息 性别 女 男 女 确诊年龄 1岁7个月 11岁 2岁 目前年龄* 8岁 15岁 11岁 皮肤情况 反复湿疹样皮疹 有 有 有 新生儿期皮疹 UK UK 面部湿疹 皮肤感染 软组织感染
面部蜂窝织炎金黄色葡萄球菌“冷脓肿” 脓疱疮
反复脓肿
头部毛囊炎其他免疫相关表现 肺部感染(次/年) 3~5
合并胸腔积液
重症坏死性肺炎2~3
(四年级后频率减少)1~2 肺实质异常 肺大疱
肺不张肺囊肿 间实质病变 真菌感染 鹅口疮 无 鹅口疮
甲癣其他感染 无 无 肾脓肿
肾周脓肿合并过敏性疾病 无 无 无 免疫系统外表现 特殊面容 有(皮肤粗糙、凹陷性痘疮样瘢痕、前额突出、鼻梁扁平) 有(前额突出、眼距宽、鼻梁扁平、高腭弓) 有(皮肤粗糙、前额突出、宽鼻梁、舟状头) 骨骼牙齿异常 下肢跛行
膝外翻小腿骨折 无 中枢神经系统异常 癫痫
髓鞘化不良?脱髓鞘病变?
双侧脑室、脑沟增宽无 无 并发肿瘤 无 无 无 其他异常 左侧面神经瘫痪 阑尾炎术后 无 HIES的临床疑诊线索 反复多次皮肤软组织感染 不典型湿疹样皮疹(后颈部肥厚及渗出皮损的叠加、腰骶部斑块、结节)
特殊面容反复皮肤脓肿病史
脓疱疮及毛囊炎表现实验室检查 IgE(最高)(IU/mL) 2830↑(≤60)# 382↑(≤200) >3000 IgG(g/L) 22.80↑(4.82~12.00) 17.3↑(7.0~14.0) 20.2↑(7.0~14.0) IgA(g/L) 0.46(0.22~1.18) 1.09(0.7~2.3) 1.46(0.44~3.95) IgM(g/L) 1.34(0.54~2.09) 1.53↑(0.4~1.5) 2.660↑(0.4~1.5) T(CD3+)(%) 73.4(55.0~82.0) 90.1↑(55.0~82.0) 83.2↑(55.0~82.0) CD4+ 42.9(33.0~46.0) 39.8(25.0~57.0) 48.9(25.0~57.0) CD8+ 22.1(14.0~33.0) 35.3↑(9.0~35.0) 27.4(14.0~34.0) B(%) 20.9(11.0~45.0) 5.8↓(9.0~29.0) 11.8(9.0~29.0) NK(%) 4.1↓(7.0~40.0) 2.2↓(7.0~40.0) 3.3↓(7.0~40.0) 嗜酸细胞绝对值(最高)(×109/L)
(参考范围均0.05~0.50)0.80↑ 1.05↑ 1.11↑ 嗜酸细胞百分比(最高)(%)
(参考范围均0.5~5.0)13.1↑ 120↑ 14.7↑ 临床评分 NIH评分(分) 45 48 48 遗传学检查 基因 STAT3 STAT3 STAT3 核苷酸变化 c.1144G>A c.1144C>T c.1145G>A 杂合 杂合 杂合 氨基酸变化 p.R382W p.R382W p.R382Q HIES:高免疫球蛋白E综合征;AD-HIES:常染色体显性遗传高免疫球蛋白E综合征;UK:未知;NIH:美国国立卫生研究院;STAT3:信号转导与转录活化因子3基因;DOCK8:胞质分裂专一物8基因;*2021年12月为截至文章完成的末次随访时间;#括号中为该项目正常儿童参考区间,不同年龄有所区别 表 2 4例AR-HIES患儿临床及基因特点
Table 2. Clinical and genetic features of 4 children with AR-HIES
项目 AR-HIES P4 P5 P6 P7 一般信息 性别 男 男 女 男 确诊年龄 8岁 5岁 11岁 14岁 目前年龄* 10岁病故 10岁 14岁 23岁 皮肤情况 反复湿疹样皮疹 有 有 有 有 新生儿期皮疹 UK UK 湿疹样 面颈躯干湿疹样表现 皮肤感染 传染性软疣(大量)
寻常疣(大量)传染性软疣(大量) 口周、鼻周、颈部感染HSV1、HPV16感染 寻常疣(大量) 其他免疫相关表现 肺部感染(次/年) 1~2 1~2 既往共2次 1~2 肺实质异常 无 无 无 无 真菌感染 无 无 无 牙龈继发真菌感染 其他感染 中耳炎 中耳炎 中耳炎、副鼻窦炎、腮腺炎、牙髓炎 无 合并过敏性疾病 哮喘 无 反复过敏性皮炎 哮喘
食物过敏(鸡蛋、花生、豆类、牛奶)免疫系统外表现 特殊面容 无 无 无 有(宽鼻梁、眼距宽) 骨骼牙齿异常 无 无 胸椎部分椎体略扁 下肢跛行 中枢神经系统异常 反复癫痫
额顶叶、颞叶、枕叶异常信号
因脑梗死病故无 无 脑软化
脑梗死
抽搐并发肿瘤 无 无 无 颌下巨大淋巴结增生症(Castleman病) 其他异常 肥胖 肥胖 颈部巨大肿物(鳞状上皮疣状增生伴感染性肉芽肿)
鼻腔肿物(重度慢性炎伴溃疡形成及小脓肿伴假上皮瘤样增生)口腔、外阴溃疡
牙龈感染、牙龈增生
牙龈切除术HIES的临床疑诊线索 大量传染性软疣 大量传染性软疣
哥哥病史间擦部位及鼻腔周围不典型湿疹样皮疹(炎性增生明显) 大量寻常疣间擦部位及颈后不典型湿疹样皮疹(肥厚及渗出皮损的叠加) 实验室检查 IgE(最高)(IU/mL) 8788.8↑(≤155) 8878.4↑(≤60) 8830↑(≤200) 3000(≤200) IgG(g/L) 21.8↑(6.46~14.51) 13.20↑(4.82~12) 8.75(7.0~14.0) 6.39↓(7.0~14.0) IgA(g/L) 3.35↑(0.28~2.22) 2.94(0.22~1.18) 1.05(0.7~2.3) 1.03(0.7~2.3) IgM(g/L) 0.63(0.55~2.32) 0.52↓(0.54~2.09) 0.161↓(0.4~1.5) 0.1↓(0.4~1.5) T(CD3+)(%) 64.3(55.0~82.0) 78.5(55.0~82.0) 54.6↓(62.06~76.54) 56.8(55.0~82.0) CD4+ 24.1↓(27.0~57.0) 22.5↓(27.0~57.0) 19.9↓(28.47~41.39) 12.0↓(25.0~57.0) CD8+ 27.1(19.0~34.0) 40.8↑(14.0~33.0) 26.4(22.5~32.37) 34.8↑(9.0~35.0) B(%) 15.4(9.0~29.0) 15.6(9.0~29.0) 17.2(9.23~18.15) 14.9(9.0~29.0) NK(%) 19.5(7.0~40.0) 4.9↓(7.0~40.0) 26.2↑(7.75~23.47) 5.0↓(7.0~40.0) 嗜酸细胞绝对值(最高)(×109/L)
(参考范围均0.05~0.50)11.86↑ 67.97↑ 3.47↑ 10.29↑ 嗜酸细胞百分比(最高)(%)
(参考范围均0.5~5.0)66.7↑ 86.3↑ 22.6↑ 47.0↑ 临床评分 NIH评分(分) 34 32 33 32 遗传学检查 基因 DOCK8 DOCK8 DOCK8 DOCK8 核苷酸变化 c.646-647delCT
DOCK8外显子1~48及KANK大片段杂合缺失c.646-647delCT
DOCK8外显子1~48及KANK大片段杂合缺失c.1798-2A>T
DOCK8外显子25~48大片段杂合缺失c.874G>A
DOCK8外显子11纯合缺失;12~33大片段杂合缺失复合杂合 复合杂合 复合杂合 复合杂合 氨基酸变化 p.L216Vfs10 p.L216Vfs10 splicing剪接突变 p.D292N AR-HIES:常染色体隐性遗传高免疫球蛋白E综合征;*2021年12月为截至文章完成的末次随访时间;#括号中为该项目正常儿童参考区间,不同年龄有所区别 -
[1] Holland SM, DeLeo FR, Elloumi HZ, et al. STAT3 mutations in the hyper-IgE syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357: 1608-1619. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073687 [2] Engelhardt KR, McGhee S, Winkler S, et al. Large deletions and point mutations involving the dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) in the autosomal-recessive form of hyper-IgE syndrome[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009, 124: 1289-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.038 [3] Bergerson JRE, Freeman AF. An update on syndromes with a hyper-IgE phenotype[J]. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 2019, 39: 49-61. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2018.08.007 [4] Al-Shaikhly T, Ochs HD. Hyper IgE syndromes: clinical and molecular characteristics[J]. Immunol Cell Biol, 2019, 97: 368-379. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12209 [5] Grimbacher B, Holland SM, Gallin JI, et al. Hyper-IgE syndrome with recurrent infections: an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340: 692-702. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400904 [6] Wang S, Mou W, Xu Z, et al. Autosomal recessive hyper-IgE syndrome in two brothers of a Chinese family with a novel mutation in DOCK8 gene[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2018, 32: e302-e304. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14847 [7] 马琳. 儿童皮肤病学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 413-418. [8] 巩纯秀. 儿童罕见病[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022: 177-179. [9] Darnell JE Jr. STATs and gene regulation[J]. Science, 1997, 277: 1630-1635. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5332.1630 [10] Kumánovics A, Perkins SL, Gilbert H, et al. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma in hyper-IgE syndrome due to STAT3 mutation[J]. J Clin Immunol, 2010, 30: 886-893. doi: 10.1007/s10875-010-9452-z [11] Gernez Y, Freeman AF, Holland SM, et al. Autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome in the USIDNET registry[J]. J Aller Clin Immunol Pract, 2018, 6: 996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.041 [12] Fan H, Huang L, Yang D, et al. Pediatric hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome: A case series of 4 children in China[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97: e0215. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010215 [13] Zhang Q, Davis JC, Dove CG, et al. Genetic, clinical, and laboratory markers for DOCK8 immunodeficiency syndrome[J]. Dis Markers, 2010, 29: 131-139. doi: 10.1155/2010/972591 [14] Barnes TM, Greive KA. Use of bleach baths for the treatment of infected atopic eczema[J]. Australas J Dermatol, 2013, 54: 251-258. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12015 [15] Yanagimachi M, Ohya T, Yokosuka T, et al. The potential and limits of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome[J]. J Clin Immunol, 2016, 36: 511-516. doi: 10.1007/s10875-016-0278-1 [16] Ollech A, Mashiah J, Lev A, et al. Treatment options for DOCK8 deficiency-related severe dermatitis[J]. J Dermatol, 2021, 48: 1386-1393. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15955 [17] Aydin SE, Kilic SS, Aytekin C, et al. DOCK8 deficiency: clinical and immunological phenotype and treatment options-a review of 136 patients[J]. J Clin Immunol, 2015, 35: 189-198. doi: 10.1007/s10875-014-0126-0 [18] Gomes N, Miranda J, Lopes S, et al. Omalizumab in the treatment of Hyper-IgE syndrome: 2 case reports[J]. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 2020, 30: 191-192. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0469 [19] Joshi TP, Anvari S, Gupta MR, et al. Case Report: Dupilumab successfully controls severe eczema in a child with elevated IgE levels and recurrent skin infections[J]. Front Pediatr, 2021, 9: 646997. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.646997 [20] Staudacher O, Krüger R, Kölsch U, et al. Relieving job: Dupilumab in autosomal dominant STAT3 hyper-IgE syndrome[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2022, 10: 349-351, e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.042 -