Anti-Leucine-Rich Glioma-Inactivated 1 Encephalitis: A Single-Center Cohort Study in China
-
摘要:
目的 抗LGI1脑炎是最常见的自身免疫性边缘性脑炎,本研究拟评估中国抗LGI1脑炎患者的临床特点、免疫治疗方案及长期预后。 方法 2013年7月至2018年1月于北京协和医院就诊且存在近事记忆下降、精神症状、癫痫发作、意识障碍等症状,临床怀疑脑炎的患者,进行血清和/或脑脊液抗LGI1抗体检测,纳入抗LGI1抗体阳性的患者。登记入组患者的一般情况、临床表现、辅助检查、免疫治疗、随访与预后等信息,并进行分析。 结果 共纳入120例患者。66.7%为男性,中位发病年龄为61岁(四分位距:49~66岁)。最常见的首发症状是癫痫发作(65.0%)。95.0%的患者随病情进展出现癫痫发作(其中54.2%出现特征性的面臂肌张力障碍发作)、近事记忆下降(92.5%)和精神行为异常(69.1%)等症状。头磁共振与18F-FDG PET/CT检查提示病变主要位于单侧或者双侧颞叶内侧,和/或基底节区。95.0%的患者接受静脉注射免疫球蛋白和/或糖皮质激素治疗,47.5%接受吗替麦考酚酯长程免疫治疗,无患者接受血浆置换或二线免疫治疗。中位随访时间为34.2个月(四分位距:22.0~45.6个月)。91.2%的患者预后良好(改良Rankin评分≤2分)。47.8%的患者遗留轻微近事记忆下降。9例患者死亡。发病后首年复发率为24.8%。队列中24例(20%)患者为青年(发病年龄≤45岁),与中老年患者相比,青年患者中男性更少见(37.5% vs. 74.0%,P<0.01),精神行为异常(50.0% vs. 74.0%,P=0.02)、低钠血症(33.3% vs. 68.8%,P<0.01)和头18F-FDG PET/CT异常改变(20.8% vs. 47.9%,P=0.02)也更少见,无复发生存概率高于中老年患者。 结论 抗LGI1脑炎患者以中老年为主,多以典型的边缘性脑炎或者FBDS为主要表现,青年患者可能症状不典型。神经影像学提示边缘系统或者基底节受累。该病患者对免疫治疗反应良好,多数患者预后良好。 Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical and paraclinical features of Chinese patients with anti- LGI1 encephalitis. Methods Patients with memory deficits, psychiatric symptoms, seizures or altered level of consciousness, suspicious of encephalitis, at presentation to Peking Union Medical College Hospital were recruited between July 2013 and January 2018, and tested for anti-LGI1 antibodies in their serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) samples. Patients with anti-LGI1 antibodies were enrolled. The demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, laboratory examination results, neuroimaging features, immunotherapy, follow-up practices and outcomes for included patients were registered and analyzed. Results The study enrolled 120 patients, of whom 66.7% were male. The median age was 61 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 49-66 years). Seizures(65.0%) were the most common initial symptoms. Most patients developed seizures (95.0%), including faciobrachial dystonic seizures (54.2%), memory deficits (92.5%), and psychiatric symptoms (69.1%). Brain MRI and 18F-FDG PET / CT showed that the lesions were mainly located in unilateral or bilateral medial temporal lobes, and (or) basal ganglia. Of the patients, 95.0% received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids, 47.5% received mycophenolate mofetil as long-term immunotherapy, and no one received second-line immunotherapy. The median follow-up was 34.2 months(IQR: 22.0-45.6 months). 91.2% had a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score≤2 points). Residual mild memory deficits were present in 47.8% of the patients. Nine deaths were documented. Relapses occurred in 24.8% of the patients in the first year. In total, 24 (20%)cases were young patients(onset age ≤45 years).There were fewer males among the younger patients(37.5% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.01). Besides, there were fewer younger patients with psychiatric symptoms(50.0% vs. 74.0%, P=0.02), hyponatremia(33.3% vs. 68.8%, P < 0.01), and abnormalities on brain 18F-FDG PET/CT(20.8% vs. 47.9%, P=0.02). The relapse-free survival rate was significantly higher in the young patients. Conclusions Elderly males were predominant in patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Most patients developed symptoms of limbic encephalitis and/or FDBS during the disease course. Several patients were young adults and lacked typical symptoms. Neuroimaging features were consistent with the involvement of limbic system or basal ganglia. Patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis respond well to immunotherapy, irrespective of the age. -
Key words:
- anti-LGI1 antibodies /
- encephalitis /
- autoimmune /
- immunotherapy /
- prognosis
-
表 1 120例抗LGI1脑炎患者人口学和临床特点
Table 1. The clinical and demographic features of patients with anti-LGI-1 encephalitis
项目 数值 男性[n(%)] 80 (66.7) 起病年龄[岁,中位数(四分位距,范围)] 61 (49~66,16~96) ≤ 45岁[n(%)] 24(20) 合并症[n(%)] 肿瘤 11(9.2) 其他自身免疫病 8(6.6) 慢性病程[n(%)] 21(17.5) 首发症状 精神行为异常[n(%)] 11(9.2) 近事记忆下降[n(%)] 24(20.0) 癫痫发作[n(%)] 78(65.0) 强直-阵挛发作(n) 27 部分性发作(n) 37 FBDS(n) 14 周围神经系统症状[n(%)] 5(4.2) 睡眠障碍[n(%)] 2(1.7) 临床症状[n(%)] 精神行为异常 83(69.1) 近事记忆下降 111(92.5) 癫痫发作 114(95.0) FBDS 65(54.2) 频繁发作 86(71.7) 意识水平降低 27(22.5) 睡眠障碍 51(42.5) 病情达峰时状态[n(%)] 症状数量 4个症状 20(16.7) 3个症状 65(54.2) 2个症状 25(20.8) 1个症状 10(8.3) mRS ≤ 2分 81(67.5) 入住重症监护室 7(5.8) 表 2 120例抗LGI1脑炎患者实验室检查与神经影像特点
Table 2. The laboratory and neuroimaging features of patients with anti-LGI-1 encephalitis
项目 数值 低钠血症[n(%)] 74(61.7) 其他自身免疫性脑炎相关抗体阳性[n(%)] 8(6.6) CSFa CSF异常[n(%)] 33(28.9) 白细胞计数>5×106/L[n(%)] 13(11.4) 蛋白水平>0.45g /L[n(%)] 24(21.0) CSF特异性寡克隆区带阳性b[n(%)] 13(19.1) CSF抗LGI1抗体阳性c[n(%)] 82(71.9) 神经影像 头MRI异常改变d[n(%)] 72(61.0) 单侧颞叶内侧受累[n(%)] 35(29.7) 双侧颞叶内侧受累[n(%)] 32(27.1) 基底节区受累[n(%)] 8(6.7) 头18F-FDG PET/CT异常改变e[n(%)] 51(87.9) 单侧颞叶内侧受累[n(%)] 22(37.9) 双侧颞叶内侧受累[n(%)] 18(31.0) 基底节区受累[n(%)] 36(62.1) 脑电图异常f[n(%)] 84(78.5) n:数量; a.6例患者未接受腰穿; b.52例患者未查脑脊液特异性寡克隆区带; c.6例患者未查脑脊液抗LGI1抗体; d.2例患者未查头MRI; e.62例患者未查头18F-FDG PET/CT; f.13例患者未查脑电图 表 3 120例抗LGI1脑炎患者免疫治疗及预后
Table 3. The immunotherapy and prognosis of patients with anti-LGI-1 encephalitis
项目 数值 治疗情况 治疗延迟[周,中位数(四分位距)] 8(4~12.5) 一线免疫治疗[n(%)] 114(95.0) 糖皮质激素[n(%)] 99(82.5) 激素冲击治疗[n(%)] 40(33.3) 糖皮质激素>3个月[n(%)] 96(80.0) 静脉免疫球蛋白[n(%)] 100(83.3) 血浆置换[n(%)] 0(0) 二线免疫治疗[n(%)] 0(0) 长程免疫抑制剂治疗[n(%)] 60(50.0) 吗替麦考酚酯[n(%)] 57(47.5) 硫唑嘌呤[n(%)] 3(2.5) 随访情况 随访时间[月,中位数(四分位距)] 34.2(22.0~45.6) 失访[n(%)] 7(5.8) 预后情况 复发a[n(%)] 47(41.6) 仅1次复发(n) 32 共2次复发(n) 13 共3次复发(n) 2 首次复发时间[月,中位数(四分位距)] 12(10~16.3) 预后良好(mRS ≤2分)b[n(%)] 103(91.2) 死亡c[n(%)] 9(8.0) 遗留轻微近事记忆下降d[n(%)] 54(47.8) 病情好转或稳定后持续抗体阳性e[n(%)] 34(30.1) a~e: 7例失访患者未计入 -
[1] Van Sonderen A, Thijs RD, Coenders EC, et al. Anti-LGI1 encephalitis: clinical syndrome and long-term follow-up[J]. Neurology, 2016, 87: 1449-1456. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003173 [2] Petit-Pedrol M, Sell J, Planaguma J, et al. LGI1 antibodies alter Kv1.1 and AMPA receptors changing synaptic excitability, plasticity and memory[J]. Brain, 2018, 141: 3144-3159. [3] Van Sonderen A, Petit-Pedrol M, Dalmau J, et al. The value of LGI1, Caspr2 and voltage-gated potassium channel antibodies in encephalitis[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2017, 13: 290-301. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.43 [4] Lai M, Huijbers MG, Lancaster E, et al. Investigation of LGI1 as the antigen in limbic encephalitis previously attributed to potassium channels: a case series[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9: 776-785. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70137-X [5] Irani SR, Alexander S, Waters P, et al. Antibodies to Kv1 potassium channel-complex proteins leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 protein and contactin-associated protein-2 in limbic encephalitis, Morvan's syndrome and acquired neuromyotonia[J]. Brain, 2010, 133: 2734-2748. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq213 [6] Dalmau J, Graus F. Antibody-mediated encephalitis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378: 840-851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1708712 [7] Crisp SJ, Kullmann DM, Vincent A. Autoimmune synaptopathies[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2016, 17: 103-117. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2015.27 [8] Ren H, Fan S, Zhao Y, et al. The changing spectrum of antibody-mediated encephalitis in China[J]. J Neuroimmunol, 2021, 361: 577753. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577753 [9] Thompson J, Bi M, Murchison AG, et al. The importance of early immunotherapy in patients with faciobrachial dystonic seizures[J]. Brain, 2018, 141: 348-356. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx323 [10] Gadoth A, Pittock SJ, Dubey D, et al. Expanded phenotypes and outcomes among 256 LGI1/CASPR2-IgG-positive patients[J]. Ann Neurol, 2017, 82: 79-92. doi: 10.1002/ana.24979 [11] Arino H, Armangue T, Petit-Pedrol M, et al. Anti-LGI1-associated cognitive impairment: presentation and long-term outcome[J]. Neurology, 2016, 87: 759-765. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003009 [12] Klein CJ, Lennon VA, Aston PA, et al. Insights from LGI1 and CASPR2 potassium channel complex autoantibody subtyping[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2013, 70: 229-234. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.592 [13] 金丽日, 柳青, 任海涛, 等. 富亮氨酸胶质瘤失活1蛋白抗体阳性边缘系统脑炎一例临床特点[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2013, 46: 461-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2013.07.007 [14] Aurangzeb S, Symmonds M, Knight RK, et al. LGI1-antibody encephalitis is characterised by frequent, multifocal clinical and subclinical seizures[J]. Seizure, 2017, 50: 14-17. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.05.017 [15] Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2016, 15: 391-404. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00401-9 [16] Bastiaansen AEM, Van Sonderen A, Titulaer MJ. Autoimmune encephalitis with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 or anti-contactin-associated protein-like 2 antibodies(formerly called voltage-gated potassium channel-complex antibodies)[J]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2017, 30: 302-309. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000444 [17] Van Sonderen A, Schreurs MW, Wirtz PW, et al. From VGKC to LGI1 and Caspr2 encephalitis: The evolution of a disease entity over time[J]. Autoimmun Rev, 2016, 15: 970-974. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.07.018 [18] Irani SR, Michell AW, Lang B, et al. Faciobrachial dystonic seizures precede Lgi1 antibody limbic encephalitis[J]. Ann Neurol, 2011, 69: 892-900. doi: 10.1002/ana.22307 [19] Shao X, Fan S, Luo H, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 encephalitis and their clinical relevance: a single-center study in China[J]. Front Neurol, 2020, 11: 618109. [20] Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Klein C, Zekeridou A, et al. LGI1 and CASPR2 neurological autoimmunity in children[J]. Ann Neurol, 2018, 84: 473-480. doi: 10.1002/ana.25310 [21] Kim B, Yoo P, Sutherland T, et al. LGI1 antibody encephalopathy overlapping with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease[J]. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm, 2016, 3: e248. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000248 [22] 关鸿志, 徐晓璐, 朱以诚, 等. 吗替麦考酚酯治疗抗富亮氨酸胶质瘤失活蛋白1脑炎的临床与免疫参数观察[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51: 281-287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.04.008 [23] Finke C, Pruss H, Heine J, et al. Evaluation of cognitive deficits and structural hippocampal damage in encephalitis with leucine-rich, glioma-inactivated 1 antibodies[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2017, 74: 50-59. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4226 [24] Lin N, Liu Q, Chen J, et al. Long-term seizure outcomes in patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 encephalitis[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2021, 122: 108159. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108159 -